<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trick the Nimzovich: Beating 1&#8230; Nc6	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 01:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Alex Latham				</title>
				<link>https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 01:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://chessopeningsexplained.com/?p=1000#comment-140</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[After 10…Bxd7  11.0-0 Black plays c6 (defending both pawns), but after Ne2-f4 White has a lead in development (If Qg5 Re1 followed by Nf4).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 10…Bxd7  11.0-0 Black plays c6 (defending both pawns), but after Ne2-f4 White has a lead in development (If Qg5 Re1 followed by Nf4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Alex Latham				</title>
				<link>https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://chessopeningsexplained.com/?p=1000#comment-139</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[i mean after 14...Bxe2 (14…c6 15. Nf4 forking queening and bishop) 15. Rxc7+ and 16.Qxe2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i mean after 14&#8230;Bxe2 (14…c6 15. Nf4 forking queening and bishop) 15. Rxc7+ and 16.Qxe2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Alex Latham				</title>
				<link>https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://chessopeningsexplained.com/?p=1000#comment-138</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I mean Ndxe5 is worse because of 9.dxe5 (not Bxe5) followed by 10.Qxd5; even after Qb4 10.Qxd5! Qxf4 11.Bxc6+ regains the piece (bxc6? 12.Qxc6+ forking king and rook]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean Ndxe5 is worse because of 9.dxe5 (not Bxe5) followed by 10.Qxd5; even after Qb4 10.Qxd5! Qxf4 11.Bxc6+ regains the piece (bxc6? 12.Qxc6+ forking king and rook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Alex Latham				</title>
				<link>https://chessopeningsexplained.com/trick-nimzovich-beating-1-nc6/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://chessopeningsexplained.com/?p=1000#comment-137</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Notes on Colorado Gambit (which I think is dubious): 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 f5 3.exf5 d5 4.Bb5 Bxf5 5.d4 (threatening 6. Ne5 winning material) Qd6 6.Ne5 Nf6 7.Nc3 Nd7 8.Bf4 Ncxe5 (Ndxe5 is worse because of 9.Bxe5 followed by 10.Qxd5; even after Qb4 10.Qxd5! Qxf4 11.Bxc6+ regains the piece (bxc6? 12.Qxc6+ forking king and rook)) 9.Bxe5 Qg6 10.Bxd7+ Kxd7!? 11.0-0 e6 12.Rc1 followed by 13.Ne2. Or 11...Bxc2 12.Qd2 Qd3 (12...e6?! 13.Rac1 Bd3 14.Ne2 (threatening both 15.Nf4 forking queen and bishop and 15.Rxc7+) Bxe2 (14...c6 15. Nf4 followed by 16. b3) 15. Rxc7+ and 16.Bxe2; 13...Be4 14.Nxe4 dxe4 15.Rxc7+ and 16.Rxb7 and White is up a pawn and has a rook on the 7th rank; these factors lead to a win for White; 13...Bf5 14.Nb5 attacking the c-pawn and threatening Rxc7+ c6 15.Qa5!! (threatening 16.Qc7+ Ke8 17.Nd6+ Bxd6 18.Bxd6, and Black loses the b-pawn and a-pawn due to the threat of 19.Qe7 mate) is bad for Black; the point is that 15...cxb5? leads to mate: 16.Rc7+ Kd8 (Ke8 17.Qxb5+ Kd8 18.Qd7 mate) 17.Rc8+! Kxc8 (17...Kd7 and 17...Ke7 also lose to 18.Qc7 mate) 18.Qc7 mate) 10...Bxd7 is more normal, but after 11.0-0 Black loses the pawn on d5 or c7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notes on Colorado Gambit (which I think is dubious): 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 f5 3.exf5 d5 4.Bb5 Bxf5 5.d4 (threatening 6. Ne5 winning material) Qd6 6.Ne5 Nf6 7.Nc3 Nd7 8.Bf4 Ncxe5 (Ndxe5 is worse because of 9.Bxe5 followed by 10.Qxd5; even after Qb4 10.Qxd5! Qxf4 11.Bxc6+ regains the piece (bxc6? 12.Qxc6+ forking king and rook)) 9.Bxe5 Qg6 10.Bxd7+ Kxd7!? 11.0-0 e6 12.Rc1 followed by 13.Ne2. Or 11&#8230;Bxc2 12.Qd2 Qd3 (12&#8230;e6?! 13.Rac1 Bd3 14.Ne2 (threatening both 15.Nf4 forking queen and bishop and 15.Rxc7+) Bxe2 (14&#8230;c6 15. Nf4 followed by 16. b3) 15. Rxc7+ and 16.Bxe2; 13&#8230;Be4 14.Nxe4 dxe4 15.Rxc7+ and 16.Rxb7 and White is up a pawn and has a rook on the 7th rank; these factors lead to a win for White; 13&#8230;Bf5 14.Nb5 attacking the c-pawn and threatening Rxc7+ c6 15.Qa5!! (threatening 16.Qc7+ Ke8 17.Nd6+ Bxd6 18.Bxd6, and Black loses the b-pawn and a-pawn due to the threat of 19.Qe7 mate) is bad for Black; the point is that 15&#8230;cxb5? leads to mate: 16.Rc7+ Kd8 (Ke8 17.Qxb5+ Kd8 18.Qd7 mate) 17.Rc8+! Kxc8 (17&#8230;Kd7 and 17&#8230;Ke7 also lose to 18.Qc7 mate) 18.Qc7 mate) 10&#8230;Bxd7 is more normal, but after 11.0-0 Black loses the pawn on d5 or c7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
